Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Should challenges be worth 10 reputation?

+15
−0

The fourth highest voted CGCC Meta question asks that SE increases reputation for questions. This is now status completed across the entirety of the Stack Exchange network. However, I notice that it isn't active here. According to Monica Cellio, it's completely doable to change the reputation levels, and this change would be retroactive

Code Golf, both on Stack Exchange and now here on Codidact, is not a good fit for the Q&A format. We should be prioritising quality challenges over answers, unlike the typical Q&A system which aims for high quality answers over questions. Changing the reputation system to appropriately reward high quality challenges seems like a good way to optimise for pearls, not sand.

Additionally, by doing this now, as early as possible, the overall reputation change wouldn't be extreme. By my brief guesstimates, no user would have an increase of more than 150 rep.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its activity. You can return to the normal view.

+13
−0

Yes

Challenges are what we need to survive

Some of our users answer almost every new challenge, but that's not enough to keep codidact alive if there are no new challenges now and then.

Challenges should get some incentive

Personally I've posted questions on codegolf.stackexchange because that's where the action (and reputation) is. I will start posting more here, especially if I understand that my contributions are valid

Challenges are a greater attraction to codidact (than answers)

If we want to get more users, they will be more engaged if we link them to a challenge where they could compete than if they see code golf codidact is all about answers in golfing languages they don't understand (yet). So, we should encourage challenges as much if not more than we encourage answers.

Encouraging answers doesn't fit with the theme of code golf

While on sites like Stack Overflow, many poor questions are written with the hope of getting unpaid help, we don't have any of that problem in code golf codidact.


feel free to edit in better/more reasons

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+7
−0

status-completed

I've just converted posts in the Challenges category over to a new Challenge post type that awards more reputation per upvote, starting now. Retroactive reputation changes are being handled as I type this; you should see updated rep counts shortly.

Enjoy the extra Internet Points!


Update: Since making this change, we've added the option to vary the reputation granted for a given post type by category. Previously the setting was global for a community, which was why we had to create the Challenge post type. Now that we can set questions to grant 10 rep in the Challenges category but the default rep elsewhere, we've changed the post types back to Question and removed the Challenge type. The only difference you should have noticed is how posts were labeled in user profiles and search results.

(This means if you want questions or answers on meta to give non-default rep, you can have that.)

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »