Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Is my extension-like library allowed to be used in answers?

Parent

Is my extension-like library allowed to be used in answers?

+2
−0

I'm not a golfer, I know, but I do have wanted to make a programming language back then. The name is BMPL (Builder's Multi-Purpose Language) and is currently a library I made in C (clang). It's not essentially for golfing or even an esoteric language, but a simple to understand and basic syntax language which I have planned months ago that was never accomplished. Instead, I spent my time making functions for the language and it's what you have in that repository.

I want to use this library for a "Hello, World!" answer which is some simple code:

main(){say("Hello, World!")}

And I've been wondering if I could even post such thing.

Question: Can I answer using this in-progress non-golfing language that's only a library right now (and would stay that way unless I got to know how to make a real compiler)?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Library feedback (3 comments)
library link is broken (2 comments)
Post
+5
−0

Yes, including the fact that it's in C.

Using a heading such as "C + BMPL" that links to the library and explains what it does should be fine. I also think that having a way to run it (preferably in one line) to verify solutions would be nice.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Additional points (1 comment)
Additional points
Razetime‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

Adding extra library counts acts similar to a flag, and many challenges which require specialized output(graphical ones especially) require libraries because the language wouldn't be able to compete without it, so it is definitely encouraged to do so.