Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Sandbox

Comments on Chequer checker [FINALIZED]

Post

Chequer checker [FINALIZED]

+3
−0

Now posted: Chequer checker


A chequer board (also spelt "checker board" in some places) is an 8 by 8 grid of squares alternating between 2 colours. Check whether a provided pattern could be a region of a chequer board.

The colours in the pattern will be represented by letters of the alphabet.

The squares of a chequer board all have the same side length. For this challenge, this length can be any positive integer.

Some of the squares may be cut by the boundary of the input region (the edges of the region shown in the input will not necessarily coincide with the edges of the squares). For example:

abba
baab
baab
abba

This shows a small region of a chequer board with squares of side length 2. Only the central square shows in its full 2 by 2 size. The squares adjacent to it have been sliced in half by the edges of the region.

Here is a diagram showing the adjacent squares being sliced in half by the region outlined in red:

A chequer board with a region outlined in red that slices some of the squares in half

Input

  • Text in a rectangular grid (newline separated lines of equal length)
  • Each character is a letter of the English alphabet (a to z, or A to Z - you can choose which case to accept)
  • No other characters will be present - just letters and newlines
  • You can choose whether the inputs have a trailing newline
  • The input will contain at least one letter (the input region will be non-empty)
  • You can choose to accept a grid of letters in a different format, such as lists/arrays of strings, or 2D arrays of characters
  • The input will not be more than 255 by 255 letters

Output

  • A truthy output if the input is a region of an 8 by 8 chequer board (axis aligned - not squares at any other angle) and a falsy output otherwise
  • Falsy if there are more than 8 squares (including partial squares) horizontally or vertically
  • Falsy if there are more than 2 colours (more than 2 distinct letters)

Test cases

Truthy test cases

aa
aa

b

cccccccc

aabba
aabba
bbaab

cddddddddd
dccccccccc
dccccccccc

abababab
babababa
abababab
babababa
abababab
babababa
abababab
babababa

aqqaaq
qaaqqa

ba
ab

zzzzaaaazzzzaaaazzzzaaaazzzzaaaa
zzzzaaaazzzzaaaazzzzaaaazzzzaaaa
zzzzaaaazzzzaaaazzzzaaaazzzzaaaa
zzzzaaaazzzzaaaazzzzaaaazzzzaaaa

Falsy test cases

abbaaa

c
c
d
c

aabb
abba

ccdcc
cdddc
ddddd
cdddc
ccdcc

aba
aba

cdcdcdcdc

c
d
c
d
c
d
c
d
c

bbaabbaabbaabba

abbaabbaabbaabb

abbaabbaabbaabba

abc

aabb
bbcc

Explanations in answers are optional, but I'm more likely to upvote answers that have one.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

More than two different letters in the input? (2 comments)
On the sandbox questions (2 comments)
More than two different letters in the input?
celtschk‭ wrote over 1 year ago · edited over 1 year ago

You didn't specify what should happen if there are more than two letters in the input, e.g.

aabbcc
aabbcc

I guess the intention is that this would be a falsy result, but you didn't specify.

Edit: I now notice that there are test cases for that; however explicitly stating it would still be a good idea.

trichoplax‭ wrote over 1 year ago

Good point.

Although this is mentioned in the opening paragraph and there are the test cases you mention, I agree it would be better for the output section to also be explicit about this, so I've added a couple more bullet points.