Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Sandbox

Comments on Decoding a non injective bit matrix encoding [FINALIZED]

Post

Decoding a non injective bit matrix encoding [FINALIZED]

+2
−0

Now posted: Decoding a non injective bit matrix encoding


The problem

Someone has created an encoding format for square bit matrices, however they have found it isn't perfect! One encoding may not decode to exactly one matrix, or it may not even be possible to decode.
Knowing this, you're tasked to write a program to decode a set of encodings and since time is of the essence, it's asked that you make it as fast as possible.

The encoding is as follows:

  • an integer, S, indicating the matrix size (2 for 2×2, 3 for 3×3, etc; always ≥2)
  • S integers corresponding to the number of 0s in each line (top-to-bottom)
  • S integers corresponding to the number of 0s in each column (left-to-right)
  • 2 integers corresponding to the number of 0s in each diagonal (main, then anti-diagonal)
  • 4 integers corresponding to the number of 0s in each quadrant (top-right, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right)
  • S integers corresponding to the number of transitions in each line (top-to-bottom)
  • S integers corresponding to the number of transitions in each column (left-to-right)

The quadrants are defined by the side length divided by two, floored. Here's an example of a 5×5 matrix, with quadrant boundaries highlighted by different digits:

11222
11222
33444
33444
33444

The program should output the number of matrices possible to decode, followed by a representation of such matrices. That representation should be composed of 0s and 1s

Example

Encoding

4
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
0 2
0 2 2 0
1 2 2 1
1 2 2 1

Decoded matrix

1
0001
0010
0100
1000

Time constraints

The upper bound for evaluation is 20 seconds to allow everyone to use any language they want.
If you manage to get your decoder to run in under a second for the bigger cases, you will beat me!

Evaluation

All solutions will be evaluated by me on the same machine, and the time measurements posted as a comment on the corresponding answer.
You can expect the latest versions for each language and compiler/interpreter. For Python, PyPy will be used, to make it a more interesting option.

There will be some extra hidden test cases.


More test cases

Input 1

4
2 3 4 3 
2 3 4 3 
2 4
4 3 4 1 
1 1 0 1 
1 1 0 1 

Output 1

0

Input 2

3
0 2 0
1 0 1 
0 0 
0 0 1 1 
0 2 0 
2 0 2 

Output 2

1
000
101
000

Scoreboard

(no submissions yet)

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

6 comment threads

Time limit (6 comments)
Input specification (5 comments)
Consistent output (4 comments)
Potential edits (3 comments)
Test cases (3 comments)
Show more
Time limit
trichoplax‭ wrote about 1 year ago

If you want to include more languages (perhaps some esolangs that are very slow and impractical but that some people enjoy optimising), it might be worth increasing the time restriction from 1 second. Probably still best to have some limit though, so you don't end up having to leave your machine running for too long.

How long would you be happy waiting per submission? 30 seconds? A minute?

Aftermost2167‭ wrote about 1 year ago

The spirit of this problem is rather alike a competitive programming project, hence the <1s restriction (almost ubiquitous in that environment). I'm more than happy to lift it for esolangs, however. They are fun! I think 20s max for esolangs is a nice limit.

trichoplax‭ wrote about 1 year ago

It's your decision what limit to set, but it might be easier to manage with just one consistent limit for all languages. There are some languages which are difficult to categorise as esolangs or not, so you can save yourself that problem by setting, for example, 20 seconds for all languages.

Aftermost2167‭ wrote about 1 year ago

mmmm, I guess since the goal is to make it as fast as possible, a low upper bound isn't really necessary, since you won't win if you're too slow anways. However, I find that the tight bound can incentivize more optimal solutions. I'm unsure what to do! x)

trichoplax‭ wrote about 1 year ago

I'd focus on making sure the limit is low enough that it doesn't use up too much of your time.

Provided you have that covered, a slightly higher limit just allows more people to enter, and I'd expect more competitors on the leaderboard to be more likely to drive more competition.

Aftermost2167‭ wrote about 1 year ago

Yeah, good point. Will leave the limit at 20s for everything.

Thank you so much for all the feedback! :3