Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Challenges

Multiply complex numbers.

+6
−2

Multiply complex numbers. 2 space-seperated ones will be input, as follows: (update: you can replace i with j or some other symbol if needed)

a+bi -a+bi a-bi -a-bi

where a and b are integers written in base 10.

You are expected to output in the same format.

For those unfamiliar: $i$ is the imaginary constant, the value of $\sqrt{-1}$, and a complex number is the sum of a real number and an imaginary number.

Shortest code following the rules wins.

EDIT: test cases:

  • 3+4i 4-5i -> 32+1i
  • -4+9i 2-2i -> 10+26i
  • -4+9i 2+2i -> -26+10i
  • -3+0i 10+0i -> -30+0i
  • 0+1i 0+1i -> -1+0i
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

3 comment threads

Input format (2 comments)
Can we use our language's native complex number syntax (e.g. `j` instead of `i` for Python, or `ı` in... (2 comments)
First test case is incorrect (3 comments)

7 answers

+4
−0

Python 3, 98 bytes

print(str(eval("("+input().replace(" ",")*(").replace("i","j")+")")).strip("()").replace("j","i"))

Try it online!

Since the input format is restrictive, I may as well just spam replace and abuse eval.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

This can be shortened to 94 bytes. (1 comment)
your output format is incorrect! (2 comments)
+3
−0

JavaScript (Node.js), 99 96 69 bytes

s=>([a,b,c,d]=s.match(/-?\d+/g),a*c-b*d+(a=a*d+b*c,a<0?'':'+')+a+'i')

Try it online!

This regex is probably the best way to get the numbers.

Also, for some reason, JavaScript math works with strings of numbers, so that's convenient.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+2
−0

Ruby, 25 bytes

->e{e.to_c*e[/ .*/].to_c}

Try this online!

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

Python 3, 63 bytes

print(str(eval(f"({input().replace(' ',')*(')})")).strip("()"))

Try it online!

Similar to hyper-neutrino‭'s answer. Doesn't replace i by j and back, and uses f-string instead of strings and + to make it a bit shorter.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

J, 2 bytes

*/

Try it online!

For complex numbers with 0 as the second part, J will represent them as ints, but they are treated the same.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

Sidef, 25 bytes

{eval .split.join(" * ")}
{eval .split.join(" * ")}
{                       }  # Create anonymous code block
      .split.join(" * ")   # splits on whitespace and joins with " * "
      .                    # equivalent to _.split.join, where _ is the topic
                           # variable, which is an implicit name for the block arg
 eval                      # eval

Try it online!

Complex literals are built like a:b.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

Ruby, 35 bytes

->a{a.split.map{eval _1}.reduce :*}

Try it online!

Right tool for the job, I suppose.

uses ruby 2.7+ features, so tio link will look different.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »