Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Meta How should we handle incorrect answers?

^ That can be used. You can try to contact the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can mark an answer as inva...

posted 1y ago by Lundin‭  ·  edited 1y ago by Moshi‭

Answer
#6: Post edited by user avatar Moshi‭ · 2023-02-15T18:05:26Z (about 1 year ago)
Add "official" help text
  • ^
  • That can be used.
  • You can try to contact the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can mark an answer as invalid? I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.
  • This is otherwise non-disruptive and gives the one who posted the answer a chance to fix it. Doesn't seem that it requires moderator involvement either(?).
  • ^
  • That can be used.
  • You can try to contact the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can mark an answer as invalid? I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site. The help text for the reaction also suggests this usage.
  • > The proposed post/solution does not comply with the rules of this site/challenge.
  • This is otherwise non-disruptive and gives the one who posted the answer a chance to fix it. Doesn't seem that it requires moderator involvement either(?).
#5: Post edited by user avatar Shaggy‭ · 2023-01-31T07:32:50Z (about 1 year ago)
  • ^
  • That can be used.
  • You can try to contract the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can mark an answer as invalid? I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.
  • This is otherwise non-disruptive and gives the one who posted the answer a chance to fix it. Doesn't seem that it requires moderator involvement either(?).
  • ^
  • That can be used.
  • You can try to contact the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can mark an answer as invalid? I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.
  • This is otherwise non-disruptive and gives the one who posted the answer a chance to fix it. Doesn't seem that it requires moderator involvement either(?).
#4: Post edited by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2023-01-30T15:05:23Z (about 1 year ago)
  • ^
  • That can be used.
  • You can try to contract the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can use that? I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.
  • This is otherwise non-disruptive and gives the one who posted the answer a chance to fix it. Doesn't seem that it requires moderator involvement either(?).
  • ^
  • That can be used.
  • You can try to contract the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can mark an answer as invalid? I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.
  • This is otherwise non-disruptive and gives the one who posted the answer a chance to fix it. Doesn't seem that it requires moderator involvement either(?).
#3: Post edited by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2023-01-30T15:04:21Z (about 1 year ago)
  • ^
  • That can be used.
  • You can try to contract the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can use that? I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.
  • ^
  • That can be used.
  • You can try to contract the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can use that? I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.
  • This is otherwise non-disruptive and gives the one who posted the answer a chance to fix it. Doesn't seem that it requires moderator involvement either(?).
#2: Post edited by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2023-01-30T15:02:49Z (about 1 year ago)
  • You can try to contract the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.
  • ^
  • That can be used.
  • You can try to contract the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". Or otherwise it seems that anyone can use that? I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2023-01-30T15:01:43Z (about 1 year ago)
You can try to contract the person who posted the challenge and have them mark the answer as "React -> Invalid". I think this was the original purpose of that feature for this site.