Activity for rak1507
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #281956 |
To be honest I think it should really be able to handle any positive integer, should have maybe had a test case for that. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282081 |
This doesn't seem to give the right answers
(more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282075 |
I'm going to be harsh and say no sorry
(more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281956 |
Sorry for the late reply, sure, that's fine
(more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281943 |
Hey, welcome to the site, the answer needs to be in the given input format, so like [[0,0],[0,2],[1,0],[1,2],[2,1]] rather than like [[0, 2], [0, 2], [1]] (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281542 |
The strings should either be function parameters or taken from input. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281401 |
These don't assume that. The explanation is based on the fact this is a bit reversal permutation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit-reversal_permutation
(more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281372 |
or +/¨⊢=,/ or my personal favourite ⊢+.=¨,\
(more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281372 |
(this as a train is my 7 byte solution)
(more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280860 |
Nice, interested in how you figured out the explicit formula. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280650 |
Yeah, my bad, I realise now it wasn't fully thought through. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280650 |
Wow! Did not expect this one to be answered so quickly. Unfortunately it seems to fail for [[0, 1, 0], [1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0]], two lines of length 1 that are parallel diagonally. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |