Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Challenges Q&A Sandbox Meta
Meta
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Comments on Reactions on Code Golf Codidact

Parent

Reactions on Code Golf Codidact

+5
−0

Reactions were just released! See the main meta post here for the details.

Currently, the default reactions look like this: Reactions panel

Now, I would argue that none of these fit for Code Golf - so what reactions do you think the community should have?

discussion
posted about 3 years ago
user card
Quintec‭
2306 reputation 17 46 242 48
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Can we not? (3 comments)
Post
+4
−0
Worked for General Sebast1an‭

I think "Dangerous" could perhaps stay on. "Outdated" would probably be better off replaced with "Invalid" or something of that sort. I don't think we need "Works for me" or an analog of it at all: I don't entirely disagree with Quintec's suggestion of "Interesting/Cool/Wow" but showing your support for an answer is what upvotes are for. An "Interesting!" reaction wouldn't add anything meaningful (unlike "Works for me" on sites where that applies).

posted about 3 years ago
user card
user‭
1546 reputation 9 59 174 89
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Yeah, I wasn't so sure about Interesting/Cool/Wow either. But I do feel like "works for me" falls und... (2 comments)
Yeah, I wasn't so sure about Interesting/Cool/Wow either. But I do feel like "works for me" falls und...
Quintec‭ wrote about 3 years ago
copy link

Yeah, I wasn't so sure about Interesting/Cool/Wow either. But I do feel like "works for me" falls under the same category as "what votes are for", I don't really see a difference

user‭ wrote about 3 years ago
copy link

Quintec‭ Sure, but I think "Works for me" helps you trust that someone actually tried an answer out and saw that it worked. Often, upvotes are given out without necessarily checking that a piece of code works. I think it could useful for proper Q&A sites, but we don't really need it.