# Reduce over the range [1..n]

# Task

I often need to find the factorial of a number or the sum of all numbers up to a number when cheating on math tests. To help me with this, your task is to write $F$, a generalized version of those functions:

$$F(n) = 1 * 2 * \space ... \space * (n-1) * n$$

Please note that the operator $ * $ does not necessarily represent multiplication here, but stands for a commutative, associative operator that will be an input to your program/function. This means that $a * b$ is the same as $b * a$, and $a * (b * c)$ is the same as $(a * b) * c$. Its inputs are positive integers, and its outputs are integers.

# Rules

- $n$ will be a positive integer.
- $*$ is a binary function/operator that can be taken in any convenient format, including but not limited to:
- A function object
- A function pointer
- An object with a method with a specific name (e.g. Java's
`BiFunction`

) - A string that can be evaluated to get a function

~~$*$ is a blackbox function. That means that you will not be able to examine it to see how it works; all you can do is feed it two positive integers and get an integer back.~~- The output of your function will be an integer (not necessarily positive).
- This is code golf, so shortest code in bytes wins!

# Testcases

```
f | n | F(f, n)
Add | 1 | 1
Add | 5 | 15
Multiply | 1 | 1
Multiply | 5 | 120
XOR | 1 | 1
XOR | 2 | 3
XOR | 5 | 1
XOR | 10 | 11
```

Ruby, 17 bytes ``` ->{2.re …

9mo ago

[Haskell], 18 bytes …

9mo ago

Vyxal `R`, 1 byte ``` R ` …

9mo ago

[Python 2], 33 bytes …

9mo ago

JavaScript, 25 bytes The fu …

9mo ago

Japt, 4 bytes Takes the ope …

9mo ago

[APL (Dyalog Unicode)], 4 byte …

9mo ago

[Jelly], 3 bytes Rç/ …

9mo ago

J, 11 bytes ``` {{u/>:i.y} …

4mo ago

Ruby, 22 bytes ```ruby ->{ …

4mo ago

[C (gcc)], 50 bytes …

9mo ago

BQN, 8 bytes ``` {𝔽´1+↕𝕩} ` …

9mo ago

[C (clang)], 59 bytes …

9mo ago

## 13 answers

# Ruby, 22 bytes

```
->{(1.._2).reduce &_1}
```

Without using `reduce`

(28 bytes):

```
f=->g,n{n<2?n:g[n,f[g,n-1]]}
```

#### 0 comment threads

# Ruby, 17 bytes

```
->{_2.reduce(_1)}
```

Takes function (Proc) followed by Array.

## 32 bytes without `inject`

or `reduce`

```
->f,(a,*r){r.map{|n|a=f[a,n]};a}
```

# Japt, 4 bytes

Takes the operator as a string but would also work without modification using a function by assigning it to variable `V`

. That can be done in the header by leaving a blank line and then entering a function in the form `XY{X[op]Y}`

, where `[op]`

is the operator or method.

```
õ rV
```

```
õ rV :Implicit input of integer U and operator V, as string
õ :Range [1,U]
rV :Reduce by V
```

#### 0 comment threads

# Jelly, 3 bytes

```
Rç/
```

Takes `f`

as the helper link. Very basic, `R`

casts to range, then `ç/`

reduces by the helper link

#### 0 comment threads

# APL (Dyalog Unicode), 4 bytes

```
⎕/⍳⎕
```

`⎕`

input `/`

reduction over `⍳`

the **i**ntegers until `⎕`

input.

#### 0 comment threads

# JavaScript, 25 bytes

The function is called with `f(g)(n)`

, where `g`

is a function.

```
g=>h=n=>n-1?g(h(n-1),n):1
```

#### 0 comment threads

#
Vyxal `R`

, 1 byte

```
R
```

Function must be inserted in the header.

The `R`

flag casts integers to ranges when an integer can't be used. `R`

is the builtin for 'Reduce list by function', and it can't use an integer, so ranges before reducing.

#### 0 comment threads

# BQN, 8 bytes

```
{𝔽´1+↕𝕩}
```

basic fold builtin version. Use as a dyadic 1-modifier.

Longer than APL since evaluated output is shorter than using first class functions.

A more fun recursive implementation without fold:

```
{1𝔽{(𝕨𝔽⊑𝕩)(1<≠𝕩)◶⊣‿𝕊1↓𝕩}1+1↓↕𝕩}
```

~~A previous(wrong) version of this exposed a bug which prevented the program from erroring here.~~

**EDIT:** the bug is fixed!

#### 0 comment threads

# C (clang), 59 bytes

```
c;f(int a,(*b)(int,int)){for(c=a;a>1;)c=b(--a,c);return c;}
```

This program written by **@Hakerh400** in the comments is basically how the other answers before this post existed actually did it, by a reduction sort of method. I'd like to thank them for making such program and the amount of bytes it literally shaved compared to the program below.

#
C (clang), ~~142~~ 103 bytes

```
i,j;f(a,b){if(b==42){j=1;}for(i=1;i<=a;i++){if(b==43){j+=i;}if(b==42){j*=i;}if(b==94){j^=i;}}return j;}
```

I wanted to try to make something similar to this, but with whatever Python has that C doesn't, I couldn't do so.

Instead, I chose to make a function. It works differently from the others, but it's all I could do.

Ungolfed form of the function with comments:

```
int f(int num, char operator){ // Assign a function with 2 parameters: a number and character for operations
int x, result = 0; // Assign 2 integers: the succeeding number and the base
if(operator == '*' || operator == '/'){result = 1;} // Check if the character resembles multiplication or division; if so, set base as 1
for(x = 1; x <= num; x++){ // Start a loop to prompt the calculation that satisfies the challenge
if(operator == 43){result += x;} // Addition
if(operator == 42){result *= x;} // Multiplication
if(operator == 94){result ^= x;} // XOR
}
return result; // Return the result
}
```

## 1 comment thread