Activity for trichoplax
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: Remove accomplished requirement to have all 66 compass points in the test outputs |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: Remove ambiguity by not using the word "set" in the overview. |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: Clarify secondary compass points |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: More test cases |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289678 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag so it can be excluded by the filter in the question list |
— | over 1 year ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #289678 |
Suggested edit: Add finalized tag so it can be excluded by the filter in the question list (more) |
helpful | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289678 |
Finding test cases that work under several different types of rounding sounds like a good compromise - I hadn't considered that. This might allow you to write just one set of test cases that works for all approaches, which sounds much easier to work with. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: Mention possible Voronoi map diagram |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289679 |
Generally I prefer a challenge to be specified in terms of its output, rather than its internal workings. So "the output must meet these criteria" rather than "you must use this algorithm". It is easy to verify that the output is correct, whereas it is difficult to prove that a particular algorithm i... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289678 |
Post edited: Replace "a" with "an" before vowels |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289678 |
The other problem with having many permitted approaches is that it becomes more difficult to write test cases. I recommend adding test cases to make it easier for people to check their own and each other's answers, particularly if unexpected edge cases appear. It is still possible to write test cases... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289678 |
I never know how much flexibility to include in a challenge. I want the challenge to be flexible enough to allow as many people and languages as possible to enter. I also don't want too much flexibility as this puts a burden on the people solving the challenge.
For example, if there are 2 permitte... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #289678 |
Suggested edit: Replace "a" with "an" before vowels (more) |
helpful | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #287082 |
I wanted a unique name for each compass point, in the same way that real compass points have NW but not WN.
I'll think about whether that requirement could be dropped, and I'll also think about how it could be better explained if I keep it. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: Specification golfing |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: Subdivide definitions section |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: Adjust test case format to allow for multiple valid outputs |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: Add heading to isolate brief intro |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #287082 |
Post edited: Use integer inputs to be inclusive of more languages and approaches |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289604 |
For anyone else testing this, note that `bit_count` requires Python 3.10 or higher. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289604 |
```text
Input: 17609903308800 Expected: 36 Actual: 36
Input: 18441077155848519679 Expected: 1 Actual: 0 MISMATCH
Input: 18440988645153550335 Expected: 2 Actual: 1 MISMATCH
Input: 9214294468855857151 Expected: 1 Actual: 1
Input: 18300371588261871615 Expected: 1 Actual: 1
Input:... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289604 |
```text
Input: 0 Expected: 64 Actual: 64
Input: 18446744073709551615 Expected: 0 Actual: 0
Input: 12273903644374837845 Expected: 0 Actual: 14 MISMATCH
Input: 9819010546270478865 Expected: 16 Actual: 9 MISMATCH
Input: 9223372036854775808 Expected: 61 Actual: 61
Input:... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289604 |
(Note that the test case failures are not related to the suggested change - they are already failing.)
In case it's helpful (or in case I've made a mistake), the code I used for testing is [available as a GitHub gist](https://gist.github.com/trichoplax/bc5dcc53c6bdd111a3a51c294fc86df9). It gives t... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289604 |
The good news is you can save a byte by not putting the `return` on its own line.
The bad news is some of the test cases fail. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Mark as finalized |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #289542 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Word suggesting Suggest a word from a word list, given a string. Motivation Imagine typing a word one letter at a time, and seeing a suggested word after each letter is typed. At first the suggested word is simply the first word in the word list that matches, but once a word has been suggested it is assumed that... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Clearer example headings |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Make input section more precise |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Make example wordings more precise |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Add description of test case format and quotes around outputs |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Add test cases |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Unordered list formatting fix |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Add edge case to algorithm and add extra examples |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287110 |
Post edited: Link to main Meta discussion |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287207 |
Post edited: Make rule explicitly reference the test cases |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287207 |
I'm sorry for overlooking the other question. I have now edited the challenge to state that a maximum input length of 16 characters must be supported.
This is based on the previously existing rule
> Provided your output is correct for each input, your code is valid
combined with the longest ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287207 |
Post edited: Be explicit about maximum input length |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287207 |
In hindsight, it might have been better to make the input a single character, so that there is only one challenge (the conversion), separate from processing a string or other sequence type.
I will bear this in mind when designing future challenges, but I'm going to keep this challenge as it is (re... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287207 |
Interesting question. I see that as a separate, slightly smaller, challenge. If you write code that works for a single character, then to be a valid answer here it would need to also include the code to call that for each character in the input. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #289226 |
There are a few things to note:
1. This is codegolf.codidact.com for recreational coding. For help with coding errors you can ask at software.codidact.com
1. Python's `#` for comments is interpreted as a heading in a question post. This is why all the comments show as huge text. You can make a co... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #289167 |
I can't see any problem that could be caused by having a random button on a Meta category (Codidact Meta has had one all this time with no complaints...) so personally I'm in favour of just removing the restriction and having a random sort button for every category. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #289164 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
A random button for ordering Code Golf post lists On most Codidact communities the posts list has a "Random" button among the sorting buttons: The sorting buttons on Codidact Meta - "Activity", "Age", "Score", and "Random" The only exceptions are the Codidact Proposals community, and Code Golf: The sorting buttons on Code Golf - "Activity",... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #289011 |
Still the same length:
```ruby
->i{i.chars.sort_by{"jbdfghklpqyit".index(_1)||13}}
```
Giving up now... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #289011 |
I couldn't find a way to shorten this, just ended up with the same length. You can use `0` instead of `-1` but only if you add an extra character to the string to prevent the index ever being zero, so it costs a byte to save a byte...
```ruby
->i{i.chars.sort_by{"_tibdfghklpqyj".index(_1)||0}}
`... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287329 |
Post edited: Reword awkward sentence |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288943 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288943 |
Ah. I see what I missed now. Thank you.
Would the first sentence be clearer with the "of" replaced by something like "such that"?
Something like this:
> Given a number $n$ as input output the smallest number $k$ such that the modular residues of $k$ by the first $n$ primes is exactly $\\{-1,... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #288943 |
Suggested edit: Typo (more) |
helpful | almost 2 years ago |