Activity for trichoplax
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #293603 |
Post edited: Add alternative challenge for comparison |
— | 4 days ago |
| Edit | Post #293603 |
Post edited: Add a sandbox question about a possible alternative challenge |
— | 5 days ago |
| Edit | Post #293603 |
Post edited: Improve example headings |
— | 6 days ago |
| Edit | Post #293603 |
Post edited: Mention OEIS and add test cases. |
— | 6 days ago |
| Edit | Post #293603 |
Post edited: Improve sentence structure for clarity |
— | 7 days ago |
| Edit | Post #293603 |
Post edited: Clarify that digits to be counted are distinct |
— | 7 days ago |
| Edit | Post #293603 | Initial revision | — | 7 days ago |
| Article | — |
Digit balanced numbers Sandbox question - Would this be better as indicating whether a specific number is digit balanced, rather than asking for the number of digit balanced numbers of a given length? Otherwise the outputs quickly become larger than most languages can handle, so either I'd have to keep the number of te... (more) |
— | 7 days ago |
| Comment | Post #293336 |
> so I've added the assignment (f←) in the footer
I agree your score but I don't know how to enter it into TIO. What you have at the moment is giving correct output so I don't see any reason to change it, but I don't think TIO is using the code field, to produce that output. The footer field conta... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293336 |
> If I remember correctly assigning the function to a name is not part of the code
Yes this is my understanding, provided the function is not recursive (so it doesn't need to call itself by name). I [proposed this rule on Meta](https://codegolf.codidact.com/posts/292347/292350#answer-292350) and t... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #293295 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #293293 |
Post edited: Add further test cases |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #293293 |
Post edited: Remove ambiguity |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #293289 |
Post edited: Mark as finalized |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #293293 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
| Question | — |
Expand a greyscale/colour hex code Consider a type of hexadecimal colour code that supports shorthand for both greyscale and colour: - A 6 digit code is interpreted as 2 digits for red, followed by 2 for green, then 2 for blue. - A 2 digit code is greyscale. The 2 digits are used for each of red, green, and blue. - A 3 digit code i... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #293289 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
| Article | — |
Expand a greyscale/colour hex code [FINALIZED] Now posted: Expand a greyscale/colour hex code Consider a type of hexadecimal colour code that supports shorthand for both greyscale and colour: - A 6 digit code is interpreted as 2 digits for red, followed by 2 for green, then 2 for blue. - A 2 digit code is greyscale. The 2 digits are repe... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292920 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag to allow filtering out |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293001 |
If placeholders are not permitted in answers, but are used in an example, I would expect some people to (understandably) misinterpret the rules. I would expect less confusion if the example were also valid as an answer.
If there is no way to express the rule "can duplicate any string that comes af... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293001 |
Does this mean that it is your intention to allow placeholder strings in answers too, not just in the example? If so it's worth making that explicit in the "What is a rewrite rule?" section. Currently it would be easy for someone to interpret that section as only allowing direct use of symbols in the... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293001 |
The section "What is a rewrite rule?" makes clear that the 2 strings can only contain symbols from your alphabet. However, the example of impossibility has rewrite rules that include placeholders x and y that are not symbols from the alphabet "MIU".
If you would like the example to be consistent w... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293089 |
There is nothing wrong with not posting in the Sandbox. I mentioned that I use the Sandbox in case that would be helpful for future challenges. There is no obligation. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292939 |
Nice​ ​ (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293089 |
> **You do not need to return all possible permutations of one single array.**
Does this mean that you are *permitted* to return only one permutation of each quintuplet, or that you are *required* to return only one permutation of each quintuplet?
The distinction is important because in some pr... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293089 |
Most challenges require fine tuning, so I post mine in the [Sandbox category](https://codegolf.codidact.com/categories/50) to avoid any answers arriving until the wording is free of potential ambiguity. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293089 |
In addition to editing to make the correct interpretation explicit, it would be helpful to have some test cases for this specific situation.
For example, what should be the output for the following input:
```text
-1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3
Target: 5
``` (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293089 |
> In the case of multiple arrays, we also add the requirements that at least two values in each of the arrays are distinct.
Does this mean "for each pair of quintuplets, each quintuplet must have at least 2 elements not present in the other", or the stronger "for each quintuplet, at least 2 of its... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293089 |
> - In the case of multiple arrays, we also add the requirements that at least two values in each of the arrays are distinct.
The problem specification refers to an array of quintuplets. Does "multiple arrays" here refer to multiple quintuplets? (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292936 |
In general, I would much prefer to avoid rule changes. In this particular case, I can't see a way to have spotted this ambiguity before answers arrived, and now that answers have arrived, either way of resolving the ambiguity will disadvantage half of the answers (it was just a matter of choosing whi... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292936 |
From my perspective, the new wording appears to be a change, which I'm uncomfortable with for the same reasons as you.
However, my impression is that from the challenge author's perspective, this is a clarification rather than a change. The wording in the comment on the challenge supports this:
... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293005 |
Update:
I've tried making this change in the link provided in the answer, and all test cases pass (identical output, but saving 1 byte in the code). (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293005 |
The challenge author has now edited to allow rounding of 33.33 to either 33 or 34, so this answer is now correct for all test cases. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292936 |
The challenge author has now edited to allow rounding of 33.33 to either 33 or 34, so there is now nothing to be fixed. This answer is correct on all test cases. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292936 |
I've asked for clarification from the challenge author, and the challenge has now been edited to indicate that rounding of 33.33 can be to either 33 or 34, and an extra test case output has been added, so the online test case for `F 3 2` is correct. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292935 |
A number of the current answers show 34 lots of `|` instead of 33 for the second test case (Input: 2/3).
I have assumed that 2/3*50=33.33 must be rounded down to 33, rather than up to 34, and added comments to the relevant answers. However, it occurs to me that some people may interpret your round... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292936 |
I also couldn't see a way to run the code at the time the answer was posted, but there seem to have been some improvements to the interface since then. There is now a "Run" button to the lower right of the code, which displays the output for the 4 test cases.
One of the test cases is off by one, s... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292936 |
The online test case for `F 3 2` shows 34 lots of `|` rather than 33. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293005 |
Test case 2 (`f(2,3)`) has 34 lots of `|` rather than 33. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292939 |
The online test cases give only 49 characters (51 including the `[` and `]`) rather than 50 (52 including the `[` and `]`).
Also, the second test case uses `1/3` instead of `2/3`. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293005 |
I haven't tested this, but could you save a byte by using `>` instead of `<=`? I'd expect this to avoid changing the rounding in the way that `<` would. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292939 |
Post edited: Typo in comment |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292920 |
That's a good point. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292920 |
Since you mention rounding, it might be worth mentioning the behaviour expected for decimals ending in 5. Some places always round up (2.5 rounds to 3, 3.5 rounds to 4), but other places (particularly statistical or scientific settings) have other rules, such as [round to even](https://en.wikipedia.o... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292910 |
Although I can guess, it's worth editing to explicitly explain how you are getting all 26 letters of the alphabet in less than 26 bytes. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292891 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
| Question | — |
Advice for hosting a language agnostic King of the Hill contest A King of the Hill contest requires that a controller program provided by the person hosting the contest communicate (both input and output) with each of the entries to the contest. For some contests these entries may be functions to be called by the controller, and in other contests the entries may ... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292835 |
Post edited: Improve sentence flow |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292756 |
The idea is not that the input would come into the program through function parameters, but that the function would be called from within a larger program, and the program would call it using arguments as input. This allows competing to find the shortest function that solves a problem, rather than to... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292756 |
> This is under the assumption that in a function solution, input has to be passed as parameter and output through the return value
I would be interested to hear any alternatives you considered, and whether you think they would make good defaults for input and output for function solutions.
Eve... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |