Activity for trichoplax
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #282881 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #283231 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags (this isn't really array manipulation) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #283620 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #283649 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #283858 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #283799 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #284191 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #284040 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #283948 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #284407 |
Post edited: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288805 |
Post edited: Remove ambiguity |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288848 |
I apologise. I just realised this comment thread is not on my [other dice draft](https://codegolf.codidact.com/posts/288805), which has 100 test cases to 29 decimal places, so my previous response made no sense.
Once I have calculated the test cases for this draft, I will apply the same approach t... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288848 |
Thanks for the feedback. Good point.
I just copied and pasted what I'd worked out (which was 30 significant figures, which happens to be 29 decimal places in this case). I'd worked it out with arbitrary precision to make sure I wasn't introducing errors into the test cases, but now that I've only ... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288848 |
Post edited: Add more detail |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288848 | Initial revision | — | 10 months ago |
| Article | — |
Probability of rolling all 6 dice faces [FINALIZED] Now posted: Probability of rolling all 6 dice faces The probability of rolling every number from 1 to 6 with $N$ six-sided dice. Input - A positive integer $N$. - Your code must work for inputs up to and including 10, but may crash, error, or give incorrect output for larger inputs. Ou... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288805 |
Post edited: Refer to input as N |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288805 |
Post edited: Explicitly allow incorrect algorithms |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288805 |
I think this is inclusive of languages that use 32 bit floating point numbers. If you have an example of a language for which this is not achievable please let me know. (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288805 |
The numbers used during calculation get big quickly (at least with the approach I used) so I have set the maximum required input quite low. Is this too low?
My main concern is that hardcoding the first 10 outputs may be golfier than calculating them. (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288805 | Initial revision | — | 10 months ago |
| Article | — |
Expected value of highest dice rolled [FINALIZED] Now posted: Expected value of highest dice rolled You roll $N$ dice simultaneously. Your score is the highest number rolled. If you play this game many times, what is the expected value (mean) of your score? Input - A positive integer $N$. - Your code must work for inputs up to and includ... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288502 |
I almost chose the pentominoes... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Condense example formatting |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288755 |
Post edited: Simplify algorithm |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288755 | Initial revision | — | 10 months ago |
| Article | — |
A word suggester [FINALIZED] Now posted: Word suggesting Suggest a word from a word list, given a string. Motivation Imagine typing a word one letter at a time, and seeing a suggested word after each letter is typed. At first the suggested word is simply the first word in the word list that matches, but once a word ha... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288731 |
As we have 4 categories with various purposes, is it worth discussing this with all 4 of them in mind? I understand any of them can have their rep per upvote and rep per downvote changed independently and any one of them could be set to have rep changes only for upvotes or only for downvotes? (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288502 |
You're welcome. Good luck! (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288502 |
Post edited: Explicitly allow separate sequences for X coordinates and Y coordinates |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288502 |
One pedantic point:
I've used the word "sequence" rather than "set", to avoid potential confusion with the mathematical meaning of "set", which includes being unordered (which would make the input impossible to interpret). (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288502 |
Interesting thought. I can't see any way that this would count as precalculation - the X and Y coordinates are ordered whether they are received as pairs or as separate sequences of X and Y.
I'll edit the question shortly to explicitly allow this. (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288622 |
I like your new wording much better. Perfectly clear now. (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288548 |
Might be better to keep the scores as they are for now and prioritise fixing the leaderboard, rather than build up a backlog of answers that will need to be edited later. (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288622 |
Post edited: Typos |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288622 |
I'm having difficulty understanding when comparing the examples with the task description. With my challenges I usually put them into the Sandbox first, to get feedback on anything that can be clarified before posting here. It has often helped me catch problems early.
Here's where I'm struggling t... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #288622 |
Suggested edit: Typos (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288502 |
Thanks for the feedback. I've added a sentence at the end of the "Equivalence" section. Let me know if it needs fine tuning. (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #288502 |
Post edited: Emphasise that the label must be the same for rotations and reflections |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288548 |
I think I see. The main body of your answer is to say "It doesn't matter", and the final section is to say "the official score should be the ceiling of the fractional byte count".
This does not appear to be what the leaderboard currently does. See the [example answer linked from this Meta questio... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288548 |
Have I understand correctly that your only objection to fractional scores being official is the lack of leaderboard support?
If so, bear in mind that the leaderboard (like the rest of Codidact) is open source. If the community supports the idea of fractional scores, anyone can update the code to r... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288526 |
I love the approach of a single pattern that can just be offset depending on dimensions. There seems to be a misalignment for height 3 and width 4N+2. It works fine for height 3 and width 2, but for width 6, 10, 14, ... it breaks.
It looks like the pattern will still work fine for those widths, b... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #282804 |
Suggested edit: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags (this isn't really a sequence question) (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #282881 |
Suggested edit: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #283231 |
Suggested edit: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags (this isn't really array manipulation) (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #283620 |
Suggested edit: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #283649 |
Suggested edit: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #283858 |
Suggested edit: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #283799 |
Suggested edit: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #284191 |
Suggested edit: Add finalized tag now that the sandbox can be filtered to exclude tags (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |