Activity for caird coinheringaahingâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #283789 |
I'd imagine that a lot of answers will just be trivial builtins. A single answer of all of these might be a better idea (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282455 |
Can we use our language's native complex number syntax (e.g. `j` instead of `i` for Python, or `ı` instead of `i` for Jelly etc.)? (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282290 |
[185 bytes](https://tio.run/##XY3LDoIwEEXX7VfUhQmljaQaNoXxRwiL8tJpyEAqLvz6So1u3NzcM3OSu762@0KXGDtoTFv10LSV24NPSxAkkERwdBuzs0baMqT1uWVSKiMtZwMYzpKH/x7l@an8WgwnQUesTepsUICVByoKTLj//AHQ7mfPEw1Xsk4Bac7GOXFNtvvxY7T9p68hrTjd607GaMo3) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282244 |
@DerrickWilliams Any format that clearly distinguishes the output is fine - the format I've used is not required (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282244 |
@MonicaCellio The examples are just that - examples. You're free to output the three lists in any order (and the elements in those lists in any order), so long as there is a clear distinction between the lists themselves and between the elements in the lists (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282244 |
Brownie points for beating or matching my 6 byte Jelly answer (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281806 |
[61 bytes](https://tio.run/##FcxBCoMwEAXQfU4xm8KMWmmVbiw5SemiYFIHyleGSDELrx7xAO8tW5pm9KWMIVJkyOAo@xfejv6T/sJ@xQCvSIyqYly6un2IPHPt0TiykFYD5RJnIyUF2QffwPeGuttZLXbSyCpSD) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281599 |
Brownie points for beating or matching my 7 byte Jelly answer (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281501 |
@Razetime Indeed it does, thanks! (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |