Activity for user
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #286855 |
Could we return an infinite sequence of Niven numbers or return only the nth Niven number? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #286240 |
Can we use something other than asterisks? (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285891 |
Oh ok (pad pad pad) (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285891 |
I think the second works in 05AB1E too (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285231 |
True, I've edited that out now. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285477 |
Some testcases would be nice (sorry for not bringing this up in Sandbox) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285231 |
Yup, those won't be given as inputs. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285064 |
Unfortunately, I don't this would work, as the maintainer of TIO (Dennis on CGCC) isn't too available ([context](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/53428659#53428659)). However, there are alternatives to TIO popping up, such as [ATO](https://ato.pxeger.com) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284668 |
@#8056 I'm really sorry, but I'm not sure what exactly rules of inference are, I've kinda given up on this draft because I don't know enough logic to make it work. Feel free to post a version of it yourself if you want, though. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283796 |
@#36356 Thanks! (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284777 |
Just to be clear, this is just for IPv4, right? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284584 |
Great tip! It's not just Strings, Java 9, 11, etc. added some methods to `Stream`s too (e.g. `takeWhile`). The newer versions actually makes programming in Java enjoyable. There's also `Map.of`, although that's less often needed. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284578 |
Just don't use Java :P (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284493 |
@#53503 Sure, but I think "Works for me" helps you trust that someone actually tried an answer out and saw that it worked. Often, upvotes are given out without necessarily checking that a piece of code works. I think it *could* useful for proper Q&A sites, but we don't really need it. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284001 |
[268](https://tio.run/##dVLLboQwDLz3KxCnXWlvvVSV@iWIQ8iaxWpIIvMS/XkaOw/60J4MztjjGdvv8@Ds65un4@g/jBq7u6q69war3lGFFdqmJrjXt3oHY9wWPh4EYEPsyG0cJ63IwMwZo/RniE4PBCF6UHoIkZZu57TBldMruojvlTQwGOq4sTNMpAennVEzQ0e1SIkmUKNEHCcnrGhWIG7uJkaor0U4DYzyTss0CUkYl8n9Qt4wYBtQWnu0Misp@wAZfoG6xV5EV117eEI7X/pL016vL@XnlM/4W... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284001 |
Here's a [311 byte](https://tio.run/##dVLLjoMwDDzDVyBORdvb3irxJaiHkJribkiQIa3an2djk8A@1JOJGXvsGY/PuXf2c1lU3ZQEl/JYPsEY9wgfVwKwIbbkHhwnrcjAzBmj9FeITvcEIY6gdB8i@fbJaYN3Tt/RrfhOSQODoY4bO8NEunfaGTUzdFBeSjSBGiTiMDlhRXMH4uZuYoR6eeE0MMh/8tMkJGFcJh89jYYBjx6l9YhWZiVlryDDeyjP@QW6oju01SnPdN2c86xzVGCBtlAhJa8bv1p... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284221 |
Should probably also add the first few values in the challenge itself instead of just having an OEIS link. Nice challenge (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284195 |
[Try it online!](https://tio.run/##K6gsycjPM/7/P802JzE3KSVRIc8qT9cwMS9Fty5NIzpPX99Ix1grT9swNjpP1ShW839JanFJcmJxarGCrUJRYl56qoahjoKhoSYXV1p@kUKeQmaeAlyJFZcCEBQUZeaVaOTpKCg9apukpKMA4qVp5GlqanL9BwA "Python 3 – Try It Online") (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284191 |
I would suggest saying that the quine should be payload-capable rather than talking about data sections, because I'm not sure what exactly that means. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284145 |
@#53588 Thanks again! (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284145 |
@#53196 Thanks! but Shaggy suggested yet another clever golf :) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284180 |
Looks like you forgot to add a scoring criterion? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284145 |
@#53588 Ah, smart! (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284145 |
@#53588 Whoops, that's fixed now (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284158 |
+1. It might also be worth mentioning that you can have numbers before keywords without whitespace in between and stuff like that. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283971 |
`Scanner` is not the only way to take input, although it might be the shortest. That has nothing to do with `Scanner s=new Scanner(System.in)`, though, which you can obviously inline. You're also not allowed to "hide" imports in the header: you need to include them in your bytecount, but here, I'd su... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283971 |
Did you even try golfing this? The two variable assignments look entirely useless to me. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283858 |
If they're just your stuffed toys and not television characters or something that people would recognize, I don't really see a point to the dialogue at the start. Only you would "get" it, so it doesn't add anything to the challenge. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283858 |
What is the flavortext a reference to? What are Mark and Cream? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283874 |
I know you're probably still working on it, but when you add testcases, can you add some for negative integers too? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283880 |
I would say that for code-golf and code-bowling questions, including test cases should be mandatory, not just encouraged. On the other hand, C&R doesn't really need them. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283882 |
Might be helpful to say what a root is in plainer terms so it's easier for non-mathy people to understand (given x-intercepts/x values where P(x)=0 or something) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283428 |
Oh, I didn't realize C strings needed that. (btw, I love the trick you used on your JS answer, I just used it to shorten my own answer :)) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283428 |
Is there any way for you to drop some letters off the end too (or would that increase the byte count)? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283819 |
Great answer! You can do [this](https://tio.run/##VY07DsIwEET7nGIKCpusrQQSfiLcgJrCuIhELCwCRI4LQNw92BR8qp19sztzrPtT07bDYJSu8sSw2@rOK3NtD44Jno0etttZf2R7KzZsbJSvTw0sXJoe3LVjNs25e7q1uGvOVSalvg3n2l5Q4Vx3W7DO2YuHhOHwTe/7JHkPVAmgoFROyDRBZYRc6wApQlkSJhGLKaGQ5ccJ6zzy8CaK730I@cn5yv/UkEmYRqsghIZZlHPCgrD8u4o8Fr@... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283791 |
A determinant in 28 bytes or less without using numpy or other libraries? That's highly unlikely. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283702 |
Thanks! I don't know how I missed that one. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283702 |
@#53588g Ah thanks, I forgot you could do that with keywords. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283620 |
You could say "Grabbed resources and weed" so that "need" isn't repeated twice but it still rhymes. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283555 |
You can use an `else` instead of the `continue`, and you might want a slightly different input format to avoid the try/except stuff. However, I'd recommend taking a look at the other answers - you don't need `z` at all if you multiply by `x` each time and add the next coefficient (you'll have to take... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283555 |
You can use `1` instead of `True`, use `n+=[a]` instead of `n.append(a)`, drop the both the `continue`s, and use `for a in n:` and then use `a` instead of `n[i]`. However, it'd be better to just use one loop instead of filling up an array and then iterating over it *again*. Even better would be a rec... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283413 |
But what's the difference between swapping and changing places? I'm still confused lol (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283413 |
What's the difference? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283413 |
How is the mentioned loophole a loophole? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283408 |
I can bet you 1 dollar (I'd bet more but don't have the money) that most of the answers will simply copy fizzbuzz, rot13, 99 beers, etc. from other answers on previous challenges without doing anything interesting whatsoever. Your typical answer would look like:
```
if input is fizzbuzz:
do the ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283338 |
Not being pretty, following good practices, or being optimized is practically a requirement for code golf :P (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283305 |
Ah, got it. (pad) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283305 |
[Husk](https://github.com/barbuz/Husk), 1 byte: [`E`](https://tio.run/##yygtzv6f@6ip8b/r////o6MNdaAwVifaAMwy0zEHsg1jYwE) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283305 |
How do you do that? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283341 |
No, I didn't mean make a full-fledged golflang, just use pseudocode or maybe take a subset of Python/C/whatever without multiplication and exponentiation. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |