Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #282630 |
Post edited: resolving based on Moshi's comment here: https://codegolf.codidact.com/comments/thread/3573#comment-12015 |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282630 |
@#53196 are you already tracking this? (Or maybe it's been fixed by now?) I'm going through meta creating/updating Github issues and wasn't sure what to do with this one. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282306 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280343 |
Post edited: new feature, yay! |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
@#53503 should meta posts in general not cost rep for downvotes? Or just this new tag? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279408 |
It's something the community should discuss explicitly, of course -- just raising the possibility. Meta activity is often community-building and community-curating activity and some feel that's worth rewarding. Maybe meta rep values should be different (but non-zero). Maybe meta *upvotes* should s... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279408 |
A question came up in another comment thread: do y'all want posts on meta to grant rep at *all*? It came that way out of the box but you're not required to keep that. If you want meta posts to grant rep but not these specific ones we can do that, but I wanted to ask if there was a broader change th... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
@#8176 if the community wants to generalize this to "no rep on meta" we can do that. Some communities want to reward "community maintenance" meta activity with rep, so we didn't bake in a blanket "no rep" rule. But this is something we should bring up at the start of new communities so they can dec... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
Thanks. Public record is important so that was my guess, but just in case the answer was "eh, don't really care after we've assembled the help", I figured I should ask. I'll talk with the team and see what we can do. (The user card is customizable, by the way, so a brute-force approach is to not sh... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
A new meta tag for the "must use one of these" set is easy; let us know when you've decided on a name and it's a simple matter of configuration. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
You asked for new question and answer post types that don't give rep (doable), and also that don't affect the stats on the user card (posts/votes/etc). I don't know if we can currently decouple the latter; will ask. Possible alternative: once you've resolved the rules questions and compiled the resul... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282443 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Leaderboards are live You might have noticed that challenges now show a leaderboard in addition to the table of contents. This is something this community has wanted for a while, and now, thanks to user contributions and a lot of chatting in Discord, it's live. See this blog post, which I meant to link here more promptl... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282311 |
Oops, probably related to the changes we made to support different rep in this category. Thanks for the report! (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282244 |
Ah, ok -- I parsed the "in any order" as being for the elements within each list, so I was a little confused. Thanks for clarifying. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282244 |
In the text you say to output abundant, deficient, perfect, but your examples look like deficient and perfect are swapped. It doesn't seem to matter for length of code and I assume the examples are what matter? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282236 |
Welcome! As a followup, I wonder how hard it would be to do the Codidact logo. :-) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279366 |
+1 up, -0 down is doable. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282181 |
Oh, sorry! I misunderstood how the change would work @ArtOfCode. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279441 |
I'm thinking we should rethink linking -- allow it even without data import, as a way to connect people on different communities. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280785 |
I don't understand the first example, where B(y) is between A(z) and C(z). Shouldn't that one end A(y), B(y), C(y), A(z), C(z)? (Sorry, I don't know how to do proper Mathjax.) (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280343 |
@Lundin "currently". This is on our radar, but it's complicated. In the meantime we can at least do this. If a community really wants a rep-less meta we can support that the same way. I suspect that attitudes toward that vary by community. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280343 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should sandbox posts give rep? Update: we can do this more easily now. We can change the reputation grants per post type per category, both up and down, without creating a new post type. Sandbox posts would continue to use the Article post type, but would now grant whatever numbers y'all tell us to plug in. Reputation from ex... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279883 |
What ended up happening with this one? It's in season now, hence the question. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279743 |
Wow. I am in awe of the puzzle and the solutions so far. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279216 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279620 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Who should the temporary moderators be? Please welcome your new moderators: Quintec, Chris Jester-Young, and Jo King. All three have community support and I said "at least two", so we're happy to appoint all three as temporary moderators. They've been pointed in the direction of the Secret Mod Tools (heh), which I promise to not include ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279463 |
I just edited the category description to: "Questions about coding challenges -- techniques, patterns, etc -- that are not actual challenges." That feels kind of weak, but we can easily replace it with a better proposal if someone has one. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279141 |
@celtschk it needs a separate git update, which is staged, but we wanted to get real logos in there. Let me check with our logo-maker to see how soon that'll be. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279320 |
https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/303 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279258 |
In case it affects answers: soon (we hope), rep will not govern what abilities you have, like whether you can edit or vote to close. Rep will be just information, not gatekeeping. Longer-term rep might change further or even be able to be disabled in favor of other stats; we'll see. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279217 |
@Quintec yes, the rule is "at least one". You sometimes see this on meta where things are tagged both "discussion" and "feature-request". (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279219 |
@manassehkatz I was assuming that once a challenge is posted its sandbox manifestation is no longer active -- we don't want to delete them, but we want to mark them as resolved. They're articles so can't be answered anyway, so using a close notice is mainly a "clever" or "hacky" way (your choice :-... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279219 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Sandbox-specific Tags Another approach, suggested by ArtOfCode in chat, is to create a close reason for "graduated" sandbox posts. When defining a close reason you can require a URL (this is what's used for duplicates), so the close notice on the sandbox post would include a link to the actual challenge and people wouldn... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279217 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Do you want any special tag styling or requirements? Codidact allows you to define three special types of tags: - topic tags: these are treated as ordinary tags in all respects except that they're styled differently so they stand out. You can see examples on Photography & Video with the "photography" and "video" tags. - required tags: a set of t... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279216 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Who should the temporary moderators be? As we have set up communities here on the Codidact network we've been appointing temporary moderators. Ultimately, of course, we want each community to choose its own moderators; we've been doing this as a stopgap, while communities are forming, so Codidact staff don't have to handle all the flags (... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279215 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should we import our old policy posts? For a small number of posts, it will be easier to create them here than to import them. Your moderators (yes we need to get some) can create new help topics, which you can link to from question posting guidance, close reasons, or anywhere else you like. By making them help topics you can organize t... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279147 |
Giving old challenges a new look makes sense to me. People who answered Somewhere Else and want to copy those answers here can (you own your content), but you might have also thought of better solutions since then, too. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279141 |
There's a bug with sorting in the table of contents. It's being worked on now; with luck we'll have the fix before you have long lists. :-) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279141 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279141 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279141 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Welcome to Code Golf! Welcome to the Codidact site for Code Golf (and other coding challenges)! We're glad you're here and we're excited to see what you will build. This community is starting "from scratch", without importing Q&A from other sites, so your community can set its own direction.[^1] We've set up the follow... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →