Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #291005 |
Is `12 PM - 1 AM = (-1)` correct? From the spec, I expected `12 PM - 1 AM = (-11)` . (Or maybe you meant `11 AM` instead of `1 AM`?) (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289782 |
Looks like the edit added a tag that only moderators can add, and since you're not a mod the system wouldn't let you approve it. I've approved it, and I see you've raised this on [Meta](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/289786), where I've written a fuller answer. Sorry you tripped over a gap in our ... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288731 |
Good point; this community might want to discuss other categories too. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287925 |
@#59168 welcome to Codidact and thank you for bringing this challenge here! @#53890, thanks for all the helpful guidance! (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287012 |
I can't speak to timing, but in case this affects the discussion: [filters](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/285370) including tag-based filters are under [active development](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/890). This would be a sticky view (until you change it) for a category's post list.
... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #286855 |
Cool challenge. This is tangential, but why is it called a Niven number? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #285064 |
Yeah, I don't think SE is a good path to the creator/maintainers. Email sounds like the best approach, unless somebody knows he welcomes PRs. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285064 |
That sounds like a good idea! I've never created something on TIO so I didn't realize that was there. Is there someone we can ask? Would a PR from one of us be welcome? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284463 |
@#53588 it is possible to not use reactions at all, yes -- mods can disable all of them. Currently the "react" control still shows up, but I've filed an issue to fix that. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284044 |
Just so you know, we're a ways away from having that new design yet. We posted the prototype and received a lot of useful feedback, which the design team is still processing. I'd expect at least one more mockup and round of discussion before anything gets implemented. So yes, by all means, think a... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283917 |
Yeah, a category has exactly one tag set, which can be its own or one shared with another category. But we can't do mix & match, which would raise issues with how to put *new* tags into their correct tag sets (most users won't be aware of things that deep) and is just generally complicated. Sorry! (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280343 |
I pinged Quintec. The moderators are better able to evaluate the community's sentiment (what counts as "enough", etc) than I am. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279320 |
We can change the rep values in the sandbox (no rep, tiny rep for up but not down, whatever y'all want) -- that GH issue I linked is now resolved. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280343 |
@#53837 sandbox posts do give rep currently. We can turn that off entirely or lower the value or whatever the Code Golf community wants us to do. I'm hoping y'all will use this meta question to determine what that consensus is. When the community has decided, a mod can ping us and we'll make the c... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282630 |
@#53196 are you already tracking this? (Or maybe it's been fixed by now?) I'm going through meta creating/updating Github issues and wasn't sure what to do with this one. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
@#53503 should meta posts in general not cost rep for downvotes? Or just this new tag? (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279408 |
It's something the community should discuss explicitly, of course -- just raising the possibility. Meta activity is often community-building and community-curating activity and some feel that's worth rewarding. Maybe meta rep values should be different (but non-zero). Maybe meta *upvotes* should s... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279408 |
A question came up in another comment thread: do y'all want posts on meta to grant rep at *all*? It came that way out of the box but you're not required to keep that. If you want meta posts to grant rep but not these specific ones we can do that, but I wanted to ask if there was a broader change th... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
@#8176 if the community wants to generalize this to "no rep on meta" we can do that. Some communities want to reward "community maintenance" meta activity with rep, so we didn't bake in a blanket "no rep" rule. But this is something we should bring up at the start of new communities so they can dec... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
Thanks. Public record is important so that was my guess, but just in case the answer was "eh, don't really care after we've assembled the help", I figured I should ask. I'll talk with the team and see what we can do. (The user card is customizable, by the way, so a brute-force approach is to not sh... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
A new meta tag for the "must use one of these" set is easy; let us know when you've decided on a name and it's a simple matter of configuration. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282482 |
You asked for new question and answer post types that don't give rep (doable), and also that don't affect the stats on the user card (posts/votes/etc). I don't know if we can currently decouple the latter; will ask. Possible alternative: once you've resolved the rules questions and compiled the resul... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282311 |
Oops, probably related to the changes we made to support different rep in this category. Thanks for the report! (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282244 |
Ah, ok -- I parsed the "in any order" as being for the elements within each list, so I was a little confused. Thanks for clarifying. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282244 |
In the text you say to output abundant, deficient, perfect, but your examples look like deficient and perfect are swapped. It doesn't seem to matter for length of code and I assume the examples are what matter? (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282236 |
Welcome! As a followup, I wonder how hard it would be to do the Codidact logo. :-) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279366 |
+1 up, -0 down is doable. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282181 |
Oh, sorry! I misunderstood how the change would work @ArtOfCode. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279441 |
I'm thinking we should rethink linking -- allow it even without data import, as a way to connect people on different communities. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280785 |
I don't understand the first example, where B(y) is between A(z) and C(z). Shouldn't that one end A(y), B(y), C(y), A(z), C(z)? (Sorry, I don't know how to do proper Mathjax.) (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280343 |
@Lundin "currently". This is on our radar, but it's complicated. In the meantime we can at least do this. If a community really wants a rep-less meta we can support that the same way. I suspect that attitudes toward that vary by community. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279883 |
What ended up happening with this one? It's in season now, hence the question. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279743 |
Wow. I am in awe of the puzzle and the solutions so far. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279463 |
I just edited the category description to: "Questions about coding challenges -- techniques, patterns, etc -- that are not actual challenges." That feels kind of weak, but we can easily replace it with a better proposal if someone has one. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279141 |
@celtschk it needs a separate git update, which is staged, but we wanted to get real logos in there. Let me check with our logo-maker to see how soon that'll be. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279320 |
https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/303 (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279258 |
In case it affects answers: soon (we hope), rep will not govern what abilities you have, like whether you can edit or vote to close. Rep will be just information, not gatekeeping. Longer-term rep might change further or even be able to be disabled in favor of other stats; we'll see. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279217 |
@Quintec yes, the rule is "at least one". You sometimes see this on meta where things are tagged both "discussion" and "feature-request". (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279219 |
@manassehkatz I was assuming that once a challenge is posted its sandbox manifestation is no longer active -- we don't want to delete them, but we want to mark them as resolved. They're articles so can't be answered anyway, so using a close notice is mainly a "clever" or "hacky" way (your choice :-... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279147 |
Giving old challenges a new look makes sense to me. People who answered Somewhere Else and want to copy those answers here can (you own your content), but you might have also thought of better solutions since then, too. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279141 |
There's a bug with sorting in the table of contents. It's being worked on now; with luck we'll have the fix before you have long lists. :-) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |